| |
|
|
Developers
hope recreation proposal jumpstarts Route 15
By
Taryn Plumb
Turley
Publications Reporter
STURBRIDGE – Let's conceptualize.
Imagine you're a visitor to Sturbridge; you've gone to Old Sturbridge
Village and eaten at The Publick House, walked the various trails
on the town's expansive 1,200 acres of open vistas and wooded escapes,
browsed the shops along Route 20 and Main Street.
But then you keep hearing about this Route 15 area.
So you hop onto Route 84; turn off at exit 1. Driving down the winding
roadway, you whiz by shops and restaurants to the right and left,
a recreation center, open space flush with trees, office parks and
complexes, even humming industry.
This is one possible future, anyway – and one envisioned by
many – for Route 15, a long beleaguered area ripe for economic
development, yet rife with ongoing controversy, on account of it
being the town's only commercially-zoned district not connected
to the town sewer system.
Still, it appears that the first tentative steps are now being taken
to transform the stretch of roadway into a viable destination.
For starters, Michael Cimini, president of Yankee Spirits and a
former member of the economic development committee, is working
on a proposal with investors that would site a full-scale recreation
complex along Route 15.
Meanwhile, the now-in-process master plan will analyze other development
possibilities in the area, and an additional, town-funded study
will look at various wastewater treatment alternatives.
Cimini, for his part, sees his proposal not only as a business venture
– but a kick-start to the Route 15 engine.
“It's going to be a really interesting test project,”
he said. “It may be the next step in starting a cluster so
that more folks want to jump in.”
Envisioned for a 12-acre parcel sandwiched between exits 2 and 3
on Route 84, the complex would comprise of a 65,000-to-85,000 square
foot dome structure with a regulation-sized field and a smattering
of smaller fields, a viewing area, a concession stand and retail,
as well as an outdoor, regulation-sized soccer field. It may also
include a basketball facility and a perimeter track, Cimini explained.
Similarly, because the intent would be to build the complex as a
Planned Unit Business Development (PUBD), it will include 40 percent
open space, as required.
All told, demand, Cimini said, has called for such an endeavor.
Many parents drive their children as far as 45 minutes away, he
said, so they can practice and play at other sporting complexes.
“It will allow people to stay in town and spend their dollars
here,” he said, noting that it will foster both youth and
adult recreation.
Cimini had an informal discussion with the planning board in late
June; right now, he said, he's getting quotes for domes. The next
step will be to determine “challenges from a municipal perspective,”
he explained.
The biggest hurdle: Infrastructure.
Because the area has no sewer hookup, it's been, as planning board
chair Sandra Gibson-Quigley described it, a “stumbling block.”
Often, when development plans do come forward, “the cost for
the water-sewer is prohibitive,” she said. “It comes
down to the infrastructure.”
For instance, an entertainment park proposed by Tuscan River Management
Team in 2007 never materialized past the informal discussion stage;
it was to include an indoor theme park, miniature golf courses,
a bumper boat pond, climbing walls and simulation rides, along with
limited retail, according to planning board meeting minutes. At
the same time, Sports Center was proposing an indoor soccer area.
Another office park project also fell through several years back,
Gibson-Quigley said.
Cimini agreed that providing private septic facilities is “not
as attractive” as being able to hook up to a sewer, as private
systems come with a “huge set of Massachusetts regulations
and costs.”
However, that might soon change: In April, voters approved the use
of $25,000 to look at four options for the area – including
a new sewer line with waste to be treated at the current, 1.3 million
gallon-per-day plant, with abutters paying for the costs; or similar
scenarios with treated water instead being discharged in the Route
15 area, or at a new, municipally-operated satellite wastewater
treatment facility. A fourth option would leave the issue up to
property owners to deal with.
But beyond infrastructure, there's the issue of development –
namely what townspeople want, and how the town gets there.
This issue was first taken up in 1996, with the Route 15 Study Committee.
Before that, though, there were snags: The town accepted the road
in 1984, according to Charlie Blanchard – but then not much
happened for more than a decade, until the state came up with a
resurfacing plan, and finally completed the job in 1996.
Blanchard, a member of the ensuing committee, described its final
report as a “comprehensive study,” arrived at through
public input, regular meetings and individual brainstorming.
The goal: Zoning that would “react” to proposals, and
ultimately “steer away” from traditional strip malls
and all-retail commercial areas, he said.
Ultimately, a historic commercial district was established near
Route 131, he explained, enabling small commercial development.
A special use district, allowing mixed-use zoning, was also put
into place.
“What we wanted to do was try to have zoning that was flexible,”
Blanchard explained.
Analysis will continue with the master plan, which will look at
the various options and challenges. It is expected to be completed
in the fall, Gibson-Quigley said.
“From the very beginning, we have highlighted route 15 as
a major issue we need to address,” she said.
And it's about time, some say. Gary Galonek, for one – he
owns several parcels along Route 15 – expressed frustration,
equating the rehashing of the issue to “Groundhog Day,”
the 1993 movie in which Bill Murray is in a constant loop, reliving
the same day over and over.
“I've always believed Route 15 should be a destination,”
Galonek said, “whether it was for work or for play.”
However, because things are now slowly shifting, changes might finally
“prove positive” in the area, he noted, as “we
seem to have the attention of everyone, finally.”
Cimini agreed, saying that, if his recreation center project ultimately
moves forward, he'll have the opportunity to report back to selectmen
about the process, and suggest methods that could help move future
projects along more quickly and smoothly.
Also, he recognized, quite a bit is riding on it. As he predicted,
if the complex is successful, “It will take a lot of the boogeymen
away.”
|
|
|