| |
|
|
Board settles in water dispute
By
Matthew Bernat
Turley
Publications Reporter
STURBRIDGE – After a brief discussion, selectmen
voted 4-0 Monday night to abate a water bill for more than $16,000
charged to the Publick House last year from June through October.
The vote came after Michael Glick, general manager of the local
institution, came forward with an offer to pay half of the original
bill, a total of $8,350.
The bill caused confusion for Publick House management when it first
came to their attention. The Orchard Restaurant, the building that
incurred the charges, has been closed since summer 2004. For 20
quarters since 2004 the building had been using less than 7,000
gallons, until the $16,700 bill, which accounted for 1.6 million
gallons of water.
At the time, the Publick House paid in full, but disputed the charge,
as no leak could be found. The water meter was tested by the Department
of Public Works and found to actually be underreporting the amount
of water passing through.
“If the Town agrees to the settlement request the Publick
House will consider the matter closed and not seek an appeal with
District Court,” Glick wrote in a May, 8 letter to Town Administrator
Shaun Suhoski.
Suhoski told selectmen he favored the abatement for a few reasons.
First, to avoid potential litigation; second, to avoid legal fees
– possibly costing the town thousands of dollars – associated
with litigation; and third, to ensure the town keeps the $8,350
in fees already collected. Suhoski noted in no way is the abatement
an admission of wrongdoing on behalf of the town.
For his part, Glick noted the Orchard Restaurant will be monitored
regularly for water usage and take steps to prevent pipes from freezing
in the winter. Glick noted the fire sprinkler system has already
been modified to prevent freezing and each winter it will be requested
that water be turned off to the building from the street.
Selectman Thomas Creamer said he was prepared to support a full
abatement citing past practices of the board where three previous
requests were completely abated, when the town was unable to find
the exact cause of the high bills.
Selectwoman Mary Dowling expressed her support for the abatement
as presented. “I think the compromise settlement is fair,”
she said.
|
|
|